<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Korea votes &quot;APPROVE&quot; for ISO/IEC DIS29500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/</link>
	<description>Notes from fourty one degrees south...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:19:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/2008/03/28/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>Nope, I mean 100s of ISVs, spread broadly across all parts of the industry. 

I guess I should add OSS projects into that as well - OpenOffice 3.0 is a good example. Thinkfree in Korea is an excellent example of an ISV using the spec to build a product that competes directly with Microsoft Office.

Many of them are using the ecma-376 spec directly today (they will upgrade to IS29500 if it is ratified by ISO I suspect), some using the Microsoft SDK, some using the Java libraries and others using the PHP libraries that already exist.

Some are indeed Microsoft business partners, it is hard to avoid given that our 1.2m global partners represent some 60%-70% of the software companies out there. Many others, even at this early stage, are competitors of ours.

Great progress for a specification that is still in draft form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I mean 100s of ISVs, spread broadly across all parts of the industry. </p>
<p>I guess I should add OSS projects into that as well &#8211; OpenOffice 3.0 is a good example. Thinkfree in Korea is an excellent example of an ISV using the spec to build a product that competes directly with Microsoft Office.</p>
<p>Many of them are using the ecma-376 spec directly today (they will upgrade to IS29500 if it is ratified by ISO I suspect), some using the Microsoft SDK, some using the Java libraries and others using the PHP libraries that already exist.</p>
<p>Some are indeed Microsoft business partners, it is hard to avoid given that our 1.2m global partners represent some 60%-70% of the software companies out there. Many others, even at this early stage, are competitors of ours.</p>
<p>Great progress for a specification that is still in draft form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorglub</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>zorglub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/2008/03/28/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 100s of ISVs around the world (including several in South Korea) who are building solutions using the draft spec today that would disagree with that comment.&quot;

You mean Microsoft Business Partners?

OOXML will profit the Microsoft Ecosystem, notably those who will rely on &quot;your&quot; SDK.

What a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 100s of ISVs around the world (including several in South Korea) who are building solutions using the draft spec today that would disagree with that comment.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean Microsoft Business Partners?</p>
<p>OOXML will profit the Microsoft Ecosystem, notably those who will rely on &#8220;your&#8221; SDK.</p>
<p>What a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Auld</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/comment-page-1/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Auld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/2008/03/28/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a fantastic outcome.
As an ISV we&#039;ve built a bunch of applications that work with the ECMA 376 document format. See http://www.textglow.net for an example.

We are looking forward to being able to upgrade our software to support the new ISO/IEC 29500 OOXML specification. We don&#039;t think the upgrade is going to be too onerous. There were no major revisions required as part of the BRM process.

Having OOXML as an ISO standard is great for us as it allows us to have far more input into the document format on which we rely than if it had stayed an ECMA standard. As the defacto XML format for office productivity applications it&#039;s going to be broadly deployed regardless of which way the vote goes.

I&#039;m watching with interest and growing confidence as the vote unfolds. Please to see NBs who have had their comments resolved moving to support the DIS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a fantastic outcome.<br />
As an ISV we&#8217;ve built a bunch of applications that work with the ECMA 376 document format. See <a href="http://www.textglow.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.textglow.net</a> for an example.</p>
<p>We are looking forward to being able to upgrade our software to support the new ISO/IEC 29500 OOXML specification. We don&#8217;t think the upgrade is going to be too onerous. There were no major revisions required as part of the BRM process.</p>
<p>Having OOXML as an ISO standard is great for us as it allows us to have far more input into the document format on which we rely than if it had stayed an ECMA standard. As the defacto XML format for office productivity applications it&#8217;s going to be broadly deployed regardless of which way the vote goes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m watching with interest and growing confidence as the vote unfolds. Please to see NBs who have had their comments resolved moving to support the DIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/comment-page-1/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/2008/03/28/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>There are 100s of ISVs around the world (including several in South Korea) who are building solutions using the draft spec today that would disagree with that comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 100s of ISVs around the world (including several in South Korea) who are building solutions using the draft spec today that would disagree with that comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Jones: Open XML Formats</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/comment-page-1/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jones: Open XML Formats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/2008/03/28/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;South Korea vote is now “yes” for Open XML...&lt;/strong&gt;

Oliver Bell just informed me that South Korea has decided to vote for approval of DIS 29500 (Open XML)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>South Korea vote is now “yes” for Open XML&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Oliver Bell just informed me that South Korea has decided to vote for approval of DIS 29500 (Open XML)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alain williams</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/03/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>alain williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/2008/03/28/south-korea-votes-approve-for-isoiec-dis29500/#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>How can you say that this is a *fantastic* outcome ? MS OOXML is deeply flawed and so not suitable to ISO fast tracking. It is possible that the issues may be resolved with enough work, but it cannot go forwards  with the problems that it has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you say that this is a *fantastic* outcome ? MS OOXML is deeply flawed and so not suitable to ISO fast tracking. It is possible that the issues may be resolved with enough work, but it cannot go forwards  with the problems that it has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

