<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenXML SDK v1.0 Now Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://osrin.net/2008/06/openxml-sdk-v10-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://osrin.net/2008/06/openxml-sdk-v10-now-available/</link>
	<description>Notes from fourty one degrees south...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 04:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mahugh</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/06/openxml-sdk-v10-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mahugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/?p=188#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>Good question, Jesper.  I jumped the gun a bit myself there.

I was told in March that the dev team was confident that Version 1 could be IS29500-compatible, but after we thought through were things stand we decided to hold off a bit on that.  There&#039;s not much point in creating an incompatibility between the SDK and the current shipping version of Office, and it&#039;s a much bigger job to modify Office&#039;s implementation than to do this in the SDK.  We&#039;re going to keep them in synch going forward.

By the way, the SDK links will all be updated later today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, Jesper.  I jumped the gun a bit myself there.</p>
<p>I was told in March that the dev team was confident that Version 1 could be IS29500-compatible, but after we thought through were things stand we decided to hold off a bit on that.  There&#8217;s not much point in creating an incompatibility between the SDK and the current shipping version of Office, and it&#8217;s a much bigger job to modify Office&#8217;s implementation than to do this in the SDK.  We&#8217;re going to keep them in synch going forward.</p>
<p>By the way, the SDK links will all be updated later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/06/openxml-sdk-v10-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/?p=188#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>That is a question for Doug - I&#039;ll flick him a mail and find out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a question for Doug &#8211; I&#8217;ll flick him a mail and find out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesper Lund Stocholm</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/06/openxml-sdk-v10-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesper Lund Stocholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/?p=188#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>Oliver,

Doug Mahugh noted on the blog-entry that you are referring to that:

&quot;Well, I seem to have underestimated our dev team: I&#039;ve now verified that version 1.0 will definitely be 100% compliant with the final ISO/IEC 29500 spec, including the changes accepted at the BRM.&quot;

Is this information still valid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>Doug Mahugh noted on the blog-entry that you are referring to that:</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, I seem to have underestimated our dev team: I&#8217;ve now verified that version 1.0 will definitely be 100% compliant with the final ISO/IEC 29500 spec, including the changes accepted at the BRM.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this information still valid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/06/openxml-sdk-v10-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-2867</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/?p=188#comment-2867</guid>
		<description>Yes, I just saw a mail from Doug in my inbox that mentioned that... give it 24 hours and try the link again it should be updated by then. 

I jumped the gun a little. Guilty as charged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I just saw a mail from Doug in my inbox that mentioned that&#8230; give it 24 hours and try the link again it should be updated by then. </p>
<p>I jumped the gun a little. Guilty as charged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Horton</title>
		<link>http://osrin.net/2008/06/openxml-sdk-v10-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://osrin.net/?p=188#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>Hi Oliver,

That link still refers to the April CTP, unfortunately.

I&#039;ve been on the lookout for the 1.0 official release, so we can wrap up all our new Open XML related improvements after switching to the SDK.

Gareth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Oliver,</p>
<p>That link still refers to the April CTP, unfortunately.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been on the lookout for the 1.0 official release, so we can wrap up all our new Open XML related improvements after switching to the SDK.</p>
<p>Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

